翻訳と辞書 |
Dr Q v College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia : ウィキペディア英語版 | Dr Q v College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia ''Dr Q v College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia'', 2003 SCC 19, () 1 S.C.R. 226 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian administrative law. ==Background== Dr. Q was brought before the Discipline Committee of the British Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons for having sexual relations with a patient. The patient had originally sought help in 1994 for depression. By 1995 the two began sexual relations. Dr. Q denied any misconduct. The Committee found that Dr. Q was guilty of infamous misconduct. The Committee based its decision on the weight of the patient's testimony, ignoring Dr. Q's testimony. The Committee applied a standard of "clear and cogent evidence". Dr. Q applied for judicial review of the decision arguing that the wrong standard was applied.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Dr Q v College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|